For those wondering back when we reviewed the GTX 1060 6GB at launch, the 970 was 15% slower, so no ‘Nvidia gimping’ as it’s often referred to appears to have taken place. Architecture © 2020 TechSpot, Inc. All Rights Reserved. In other words, this is one of the best GTX 970s around versus an early RX 480 that’ll surely improve over time with third-party manufacturers pre-overclocking it and adding beefy cooling systems. The new AMD Radeon RX 590 is an uprated version of the RX 580 on the smaller 12nm process node. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate. Next up we have Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege and here the GTX 970 is more competitive than I was expecting. We may earn a commission if you click a deal and buy an item. config = { My testing looked at an EVGA-overclocked GTX 970 and a reference RX 480. The GTX 970 mimicked the GTX 1060 3GB, or I guess you could say the 1060 mimics the 970, either way performance was decent despite trailing the R9 290. window.addEventListener( 'load', function() { Compare AMD Radeon RX 590 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 side-by-side. Despite its 3.5GB of fast VRAM, the GTX 970 remains the more reliable performer which might surprise some of you, especially after you’ve no doubt heard over and over again how it’s doomed and will be completely useless before too long. With the larger number of pixels deployed the RX 480 averaged 57.2fps, which was more than a frame faster than the Nvidia card. Language: 'en-us', PlacementID: 'plte5ygLBZuT8RrDXzB', DiRT 4 also favors Radeon GPUs using CMAA, while Strange Brigade is an AMD sponsored title and well optimized for Radeon GPUs. That said the 1% low performance was more consistent, though the experience was still extremely smooth with the 970. It’s a competitive set of results for a title that’s among the toughest benchmarks around thanks to its reliance on high-end lighting and particle effects. Nvidia’s card continued its 1080p lead with an average framerate of 85.4fps, but its advantage was a slim 2fps – and it was overturned when I turned the resolution up to 2,560 x 1,440. AMD’s shrunken architecture consumed less power than its rival, too. Índice de píxeles 17.76 GPixel/s mayor? Throughout 2015 the GTX 970 was typically the puncher GPU and with a slew of quality AIB models to pick from, it easily outsold the R9 290. Based on 1,226,223 user benchmarks for the AMD RX 580 and the Nvidia GTX 970, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 652 GPUs. This can be seen when comparing the GTX 1060 and RX 580 for example, it can also be seen when comparing older GPUs such as the GTX 970 and R9 290. It doesn’t sound like much of a contest on paper, but the benchmarks reveal a far closer fight than I expected. There’s little between their power consumption ratings, despite that: the RX 480’s 150W power demand is only five Watts higher than the GTX 970. The Radeon’s average of 54.3fps will ensure smooth gameplay at this higher resolution. scp.onload = function() { 17.76 GPixel/s höhere Pixelrate? New hardware has caused that card to drop in price, which means it’s now a key challenger for AMD’s card. Is it worth shelling out for the new Radeon, or can Nvidia’s classic GTX 970 hold its own? The RX 480 remains a mid-range card, so expectations should be managed. ChannelID: '5f2bc16e3709e324807ce0c1', As a Polaris refresh, the RX 570 runs at a slightly faster clock speed than the RX 470. That’s clear evidence of the newer architecture, increased memory throughput and shrunken manufacturing process paying dividends. 67.3 GPixel/s vs 49.54 GPixel/s Its 63.46fps average at 1080p was just over three frames quicker than the GTX 970, and the Radeon then scored 44.2fps at 1440p – far better than the 36.7fps over the Nvidia card. Performance at 1080p using the ultra quality preset certainly was respectable and you won’t need to turn down any quality settings here. Text_Color: '', The red team has made bold claims about its new card, saying that it’s the best 1440p and VR-ready card for around £200. Its Full HD average of 69.7fps was ten frames better than the GTX 970 and on the right side of the crucial 60fps barrier, and it was nine frames quicker than its rival at 1440p. Now if you’ve been holding out all these years for a $300-$400 upgrade, the GeForce RTX 2060 might be of interest. The RX 480 consistently beats its rival while consuming less power: its peak draw of 249W is eleven fewer than the same machine with the GTX 970 installed. AMD is building the RX 480 in two versions – one with 4GB of GDDR5 memory, and one with 8GB. }; It was mostly the older titles, or Nvidia sponsored games where the green team did well, games such as World of Tanks, Warhammer II, Metro Exodus, Project Cars 2, and Fortnite, for example. Based on what we’ve seen so far we don’t imagine the GTX 970 is still 10-15% faster like what most reviewers found back in late 2014. On average the 970 was 14% slower. However many of those who purchased the R9 290 were jumping up and down about how it would be a better investment down the track. It features 1664 SPUs as well as 104 TAUs and 64 Rasterization Operator Units. There you have it, the GTX 970 went from ~10-15% faster four years ago to a percent faster in 2019 against the Radeon R9 290 based on our 33 game test sample that includes many newer titles. Both cards beat the magical 60fps figure, with the Nvidia silicon almost four frames ahead. Compare those specifications to the Radeon RX 580, which makes use of a 14 nm design. })(document, window); This meant it was 23% faster than the R9 290, placing it basically on par with 6GB GTX 1060 and RX 590. The 970 was still the superior GPU in this title. The Radeon’s specification compares well to Nvidia’s older card. That means the GTX 970 had an 8.63% lead, but the gap closed to 5.81% at 1440p – perhaps because the RX 480 is flexing its extra transistors and memory. The GTX 970’s lesser specification means it provides a throughput rating of 3.4TFLOPS – far less than the 5.8TFLOPS of the AMD card. The GTX 970 uses the older 28nm manufacturing process, which means it has half a billion fewer transistors than its rival, and it only has 1,664 stream processors. Those 34fps averages will be undermined by sluggish minimum framerates, especially when the on-screen action becomes more frantic. We’re completely attributing the R9 290’s comeback to AMD’s driver development and not anything to do with the partitioned VRAM buffer or Nvidia neglecting driver support. UserBenchmark USA-User . i[btoa('video intelligence start')].init(config); options here in mid-2019. The AMD Radeon RX 590 is a desktop graphics card positioned in the mid-range of 2018. If you want to read our individual reviews, you can click here for the RX 480 and the GTX 970. Those features have been warmly welcomed, but besides the overall positive responses what we noticed in common in your feedback was the request to test the GeForce GTX 970, which was the performance/value offering of the time and a GPU some of you are still rocking in today's games with some success. Guidance requested regarding upgraded configuration of computer, Ad-free TechSpot experience while supporting our work. Font: '', Intro The GeForce GTX 970 has clock speeds of 1050 MHz on the GPU, and 1750 MHz on the 4096 MB of GDDR5 memory. The GeForce pulled ahead in our test when looking at the average frame rate, however the 1% low result was identical with both managing 40 fps, so overall the experience was much the same. Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon RX 590: Which mid-range budget graphics card should you buy? The midrange GPU market is suddenly flush with super (and Super!) Seriously though, that’s an impressive comeback for the R9 290. Intro The GeForce GTX 970 comes with core clock speeds of 1050 MHz on the GPU, and 1750 MHz on the 4096 MB of GDDR5 memory. The Radeon RX 570 is the second in the line-up of AMD’s 500 series of GPUs targeting the popular mid-range market. That placed both the GTX 970 and R9 290 on par with the 3GB 1060. That supports my conclusions from real-world tests: the GTX 970 might be better in lower resolutions and easier games, but the RX 480 is a more efficient architecture and deploys its power with more aplomb – therefore it takes key victories in tougher tests. ¿Por qué es Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 mejor que AMD Radeon RX 590? The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. Finally a solid win for the GTX 970, this time testing with Hitman 2 using the DirectX 11 API. This one’s too close to call and well within the margin of error. As evidenced by Vega 64 beating the GTX 1080 and RTX 2060, while the RX 580 crushed the GTX 1060. Based on 927,070 user benchmarks for the AMD RX 570 and the Nvidia GTX 970, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 652 GPUs. I recall this being a very easy win for the R9 290 back in the day, but here it was just 5% on average. Keywords: '', Its average of 30.6fps is five frames better than the GTX 970 and it does break the important 30fps barrier, but don’t assume that it’ll play Hitman smoothly at 4K without compromising on several of the graphics options. The RX 480’s new architecture and lower price see it charge headlong into one of computing’s busiest battlefields – and, in particular, up against Nvidia’s older GTX 970. EVGA. AMD has made the unusual decision to debut its Polaris architecture with this mid-range card. This is a GPU designed for Full HD and 1440p gaming, and in those department it’s stop on – but any higher resolutions will cause it to struggle. Recently we've looked back at the GeForce GTX 980 Ti and the GTX 960, both popular GPUs from yesteryear. So today we’ve got an old fashioned GPU battle pitting the GeForce GTX 970 against the Radeon R9 290. As usual the test system used is powered by a Core i9-9900K clocked at 5 GHz with 32GB of DDR4-3200 memory. This game is full of particle and fire effects, which can make it a little tricky for some GPUs, especially considering I run this test at Ultra settings. As a Polaris refresh, the RX 570 runs at a slightly faster clock speed than the RX 470. The GTX 970 leads the way with a score of 2,767 points, but the RX 480 is barely behind thanks to its result of 2,638 points. }; The doomsday scenario still hasn’t happened and with a few minor tweaks the GTX 970 can carve its way through the latest and greatest titles at 1080p without an issue. I benchmarked the GTX 970 and RX 480 on TrustedReviews’ test rig, which has been designed to match the specifications of a standard enthusiast gaming PC. DIRT RallyUltra at 1,920 x 1,080 average
GTX 970: 97.3
RX 480: 88.9Ultra at 2,560 x 1,440, average
GTX 970: 65.4
RX 480: 61.6Ultra at 3,840 x 2,160, average
GTX 970: 34.4
RX 480: 34.7. It’s no surprise that both cards blitzed this rally racer at 1080p: the RX 480 averaged 88.9fps, while the Nvidia card was about nine frames faster. Both cards also managed to beat 30fps at 4K, which isn’t too surprising considering that this is a less intensive game. There’s very little to choose between these two cards in the synthetic 3D Mark Fire Strike test. With those comparisons previously established it comes as no surprise that the R9 290 dusts the GTX 970 beating it by a 19% margin. For what is a similar level of performance the R9 290 drove up system power consumption by 30%. The GTX 970 was the newer product and unsurprisingly it came in offering a little extra performance at a slightly better price. Moving on we find a close battle when testing with Resident Evil 2, here the R9 290 was just 6fps faster at 1080p and this meant the 970 performed more like a 3GB 1060, not a bad result given the average frame rate was 66 fps, but this one is still a win for the Radeon 290. Each title is run at its highest settings, and I’ve … Whether you're looking to upgrade or not, it should be interesting to see after 5 years which GPU is the ultimate winner... Quickly rewinding for a moment, Nvidia revealed the GTX 970 for the first time in September 2014, some ten months after the Radeon R9 290’s release. But, of course, there are external factors to consider as well. AMD’s slow driver development. To give credit where credit is due, the Radeon R9 290 is also extremely impressive in 2019. Sapphire Radeon RX 580 Nitro+ 4GB GDDR5 (256 Bit) DVI-D, 2xHDMI, 2xDP (11265-31-20G) Lite-On iHAS124-14 SilentiumPC Armis AR3 TG (SPC199) HyperX DDR4, 16GB, 3200MHz, CL16 (HX432C16PB3K2/16) MSI B450 TOMAHAWK AMD Ryzen 5 2600 3.9GHz, 16MB, BOX (YD2600BBAFBOX) XFX TS Single Rail 650W (P1-650G-TS3X) Samsung 860 EVO 500GB SATA3 … Either way it’s not great news for the red team. That’s good, but don’t expect either of these GPUs to handle 4K gaming. Early benchmarks indicate that the AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB will be around 10-15% faster than the Nvidia GTX 1060 in terms of gaming performance, and around 6% faster than the Radeon RX … We promise the order of the games wasn’t chosen on purpose but here we have yet another title that works extremely well with AMD GPUs. PublisherID: '585309391442756', XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS Black Edition 1405MHz OC+, 8gb 256bit GDDR5, DX12 VR Ready, Double Dissipation, Dual BIOS, 3xDP HDMI DVI, PCI-E AMD Graphics Card (RX … Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 better than AMD Radeon RX 580? It is manufactured in 12nm and offers 2,304 shader cores and 8 GB GDDR5 VRAM using a … We’ll look closely at the results for 13 of the titles before moving into a few head to head comparison graphs. The AMD Radeon RX 590 is a desktop graphics card positioned in the mid-range of 2018. IAB_Category: 'IAB1', In this comparison, the RX 480 takes a clear win in the 1440p stakes. It's also the cooler GPU but most important of all, either solution will let you play games at 1080p comfortably all these years later. The AMD Radeon RX 590 is a desktop graphics card positioned in the mid-range of 2018. Let's see those blue bar graphs now... First up we have Apex Legends and right away we’re seeing pretty neck and neck performance between the GTX 970 and R9 290. TECHSPOT : Tech Enthusiasts, Power Users, Gamers. And, finally, it’s cooler – albeit only by three degrees. The RX 480 maintained its slim advantage with an average of 39.3fps. And the last game we’re going to look at individually is Far Cry New Dawn and here we have a tie at 70 fps a piece. It is manufactured in 12nm and offers 2,304 shader cores and 8 GB GDDR5 VRAM using a … Buy Now: AMD Radeon RX 480 at Amazon.com from $199.99. Architecture Shadow of the Tomb Raider is another title that sees AMD GPUs doing quite well and here the GTX 970 was 12% slower than the R9 290. ... 570 580 590. This is the easiest game in this testing setup, with plenty of fast-paced textures but less intensive workloads in other departments. This means that the narrow lead the GTX 970 shows in any of the above benchmarks will likely be diminished by more powerful RX 480s. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. 24.4 GPixel/s higher pixel rate? The system that I’m testing with has an Intel i7-8700K CPU overclocked to 5.0GHz in an MSI Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon motherboard, along with 16GB of T-Force Night Hawk CL16 memory from Team Group … During his time writing about technology he’s developed obsessio…, AMD Radeon RX 480 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 970. When compared to a modern GPU we’re looking at GTX 1060 3GB-like performance. This is also the only game where the RX 480 led the way at every resolution and opened up a wider lead over the GTX 970 as I increased the pixel count. We haven’t tested the GTX 1060 in 3GB form, but we have full benchmarks of the 6GB version, which show it’s a worthy 1440p card. Fortnite is a game that favors Nvidia GPUs thanks to its use of the Unreal Engine 4. That means the game isn’t playable at its maximum settings at 3,840 x 2,160, but it was a whopping 37.61% faster than the GTX 970 in the same test. The GTX 970 is similarly quick at those resolutions and is a tad cheaper, but it doesn’t have the new architecture, the extra memory or the software improvements – as you’d expect for an older card, of course. Performance in Just Cause 4 was similar using either GPU. This is how we make money. AMD also does well in The Division 2, Sniper Elite 4, Forza Horizon 4, and Shadow of the Tomb Raider. Frame rates were surprisingly similar when testing with Battlefield V, here the GTX 970 was just 3 fps faster which comes to be a 5% margin. scp.src='https://s.vi-serve.com/tagLoader.js'; The RX 480 delivers excellent Full HD and 1440p performance for a surprisingly low price – and its consistent leads in tougher tests bode well for the future and indicate that AMD’s new hardware is doing its job. The GTX 970 did well in this title and as we’ve seen many times already, it’s often very similar to the 3GB GTX 1060. Here the 970 was 18% faster, delivering 87 fps on average. The GeForce GPU was 12% faster though I should point out that enabling the new patched-in DX12 mode didn’t change things. Mike has worked as a technology journalist for more than a decade, writing for most of the UK’s most well-known websites and magazines. There’s your ‘fine wine’ working right there, a.k.a. CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USB FPS EFPS ... 570 580 590. FontSize: '', This is why we typically call it a tie when the margin is 5% or less. There’s a clear trend to be seen across most of my test games: if a game is a tougher benchmark, the RX 480 tends to outperform its older rival. The Division 2 is a title that works exceptionally well with AMD hardware. 67.3 GPixel/s vs 49.54 GPixel/s Moving on we decided to see how the GTX 970 stacks up against the GTX 1060 6GB. At least today we can settle which GPU offers the best performance in 2019. The GTX 970 also stacks up really well in Metro Exodus with an average of 48 fps at 1080p using the ultra quality settings. Warum ist Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 besser als AMD Radeon RX 590? Expect slightly different results with different models.