GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5770, WTF? Window mode: fullscreen Here are the charts of FurMark scores for AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards (and Intel HD Graphics GPUs as well). Fan: 75%. Components that offer the best value for money have great performance (yellow) and a low price (green). Or passmark’s performance test 9? Preset:1080 Average 36fps. Device ID: 0x10de – 0x1180 I let the test run for an hour. 2046 MB – Radeon RX 5500 XT FurMark 1.22.0.0 - score ID: 215597 FurMark(donut) | OpenGL Submitted by anonymous on Nov 30, 2020 @ 00:45:23 Bench duration: 15min Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz Graphics drivers: Catalyst 12.10 – 9.002-120928m-148276C-ATI 9-27-2012 Yes you’re right, I changed a bit the burn-in test mode (actually it’s a checkbox in the Settings box). Frames 2250 Its not adding up. GPU core: 900>1020 MHz, memory: 1250>1450 MHz It strives for the excellence in power, speed, cooling, noise, gaming, and size with no compromise on performance. But you should see a good difference This Subreddit is community run and does not represent NVIDIA in any capacity unless specified. 1080 preset: 1306 points (21 FPS, 60000 ms), Phenom II X3 720 2.8 ghz. clocks: GPU core: 1084 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz (The MB Fans are the two fans synced to temperature.). – Radeon RX 470, Update: 2014.11.10 Graphics drivers: Catalyst 12.10 – 9.002-120928m-148276C-ATI 9-27-2012 Overpity and epic fail0rs with dual radons, you s**k everywhere with your garbage graphic cards. ... 21787 graphics score, 11605 physics score… Intel Core i7 2700K OEM UNLOCK Is this a limitation based on my card, Or simply my other hardware being sub-par? The windowed runs use a slightly smaller than 1920x1080 resolution and allows for slightly higher FPS values) Burn-In оценка 2825 points (30 FPS) Currently I’m benchmarking the HD 6970 but I have some problems with my X58 testbed. Windows XP 32 Bit Results: I suggest you do the same if you want a direct comparison. 700W FSP Aurum PSU , Asus AMD Radeon HD6870 9.18.13.1422 (3-14-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 GPU clock: 1050 MHz score: 940 points, temp: 65 celcius, Max GPU Temp: 70°C RAM: DDR3 GSKILL Ripjaw 16383 MB FPS: min:80, max:81, avg:80 – OPTIONS: DynBkg While an overclocked 6970 will still smash my 6950, I’m VERY happy with 31FPS on the 1080 test…! FPS: min:92, max:112, avg:102 This seems to occur with 7850,7870,7950 and some green cards like 660Ti according to google. Timespy: 6630 overall, 7299 Graphics score, Firestrike: 16204 overall, 21787 graphics score, 11605 physics score, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. I got 3515 points with my HD5970… Higher than the HD7970! system memory:16324 MB GPU0 – Vendor: 0x10de – Device: 0x1180 – Max GPU temp: 77 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz GPU core: 1241 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz CPU: Intel (R ) Core (TM) i7-3770K 4x CPU@3.50GHz / 8x cpu virtuell mit cpu boost 3,9 ghz pro kern GPU core: 1380MHz I'd save the money and just overclock your processor. AMD FX(tm)-8150 Eight-Core Processor GPU core: 952 MHz, memory: 2257 MHz Ambient temp is... warmer to say the least (probably around 72F so about 22C), 4 Intake fans at the front (Corsair SP120, 2 synced through speedfan to GPU temp, 2 at full speed via fan controller). CPU-Geschwindigkeit: 3510MHz My 6850 cyclone OC gets 23fps. Preset:1080 1TB WD CAVIAR BLACK WD1002FAEX The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is the second fastest Pascal based graphics card in November 2017. – GeForce GTX TITAN Black FPS: min:1, max:3, avg:0 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Benchmark results for the GTX 1070 … max fps in full HD: ~43 GPU core: 830 MHz, memory: 2004 MHz How about TimeSpy? That would mean I’m beating a 680! 3125 MHz Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples, FPS: min:65, max:66, avg:64 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, GeForce GTX 670 x2 /PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189), Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 19418 frames, 21 FPS, 79°C In this review we test the GeForce GTX 1070 (Nvidia Founders Edition). – GeForce RTX 2070, Update: 2017.12.13 Разрешение: 1920 х 1080 ya better then a 580 , Burn-INSCORE: 2618 points If you have overclocked, scale it back a little. GeForce GTX 465 System Info: Too hot? Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz I understand you’ve chosen 2x 16:9 (and 1x 16:10, leaving out 4:3) where baseline is set at 1280×720 but the condition of “full-screen” isn’t applicable for the aforesaid mainstream 16:9 monitors (1366×768) as it simply wont switch (tested). BURN-IN SCORE: 1345 points The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. I swear I literally stared at the average the whole 60 seconds (plus warm-up) throughout 120+ frames. FPS: min:50, max:65, avg:51 – OPTIONS: DynBkg GPU mem: 1300MHz I ran the Test with my Asus GTX 560 Ti 1GB DDR5( Burn in benchmark 1920x 1080) and got a Score of 2559 points. Settings: 1280×1024 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode. Or Firestrike? festplatte 1 x ssd samsung 130gb SCORE: 3778 points (62 FPS), Submitted by kalvinj (anonymous mode) on December 18 2012, 9:11 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds using msi afterburner. The GeForce GTX 1070 is a performance-segment graphics card by NVIDIA, launched in June 2016. Catalyst 10.2 – 8.593.100-100210a-095952E-ATI (2-10-2010) Other scores can be found online in FurMark GPU Database section. These scores can be used as reference for checking your FurMark score with FurMark 1.9.x and FurMark 1.10.x (will be released shortly, currently in testing…). crap monitor x.x) 4789 points (79 FPS, 60000 ms)with two EVGA GTX 460’s. This isn't much hotter than my 970, is this about what I should expect for a Reference Pascal card? 3505 points for the HD 6970 CF is get with PowerTune = 0%. GeForce GTX 560/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1201) Shapphire Radeon HD 6850 I ran my MSI 7770/OC to 1160mhz single card and got a 1680 with the 1920 x 1080 burn in test. Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9300 @ 2.50GHz Each entry includes the model of the graphics card with clock speeds, the TPC (Total Power Consumption) of the X58 testbed at idle and under full load, the max GPU temperature and the graphics driver version. Update: 2017.12.12 Running the 1920×1080 on my HD 6670 gave me a whopping 531 pts (4891 frames, 5FPS, 62°C). Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, i5 5675c @4.1GHz | Vega 56 | 16Gb @1866MHz. So what’s the formula here my man. Preset:1080 GPU core: 775 MHz, memory: 1000 MHz Clcok:GPU core: 700 MHz, memory: 1848 MHz ASRock Z68 Extreme7 Gen3 Settings: 1280×720 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode. Sabertooth 990FX AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2500+ The reference clock speeds of the GPU are: 1290MHz for the base clock and 1392MHz for the boost clock. Hope this helps in some way. Drivers: 9.18.13.2680 (8-18-2013)-GL:nvoglv64 4gb DDR3 ram. GPU core: 1228 MHz, memory: 3402 MHz 9.18.13.2049 (6-21-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 My goodness, how in the world did I completely miss this post? Graphics drivers: Fan Speed at 100% of test 76-77% Resolution: 1280×720 (FS) – AA:0 samples This means that the […] 8GB DDR3 1800 + SSD, Burn in 15min 1080p BURN-IN SCORE: 4638 points let me know how it goes egdesignsvc@gmail.com, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78113 for 720p same setting as above, http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/3289/62160830.jpg. ... 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score. FurMark is an OpenGL 2 benchmark. FurMark benchmark scores database - OpenGL. OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1] – Radeon RX Vega 64 CrossFire No AA this time The top model of the GL504 with a Core i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070, 32 GB of RAM, and a 512-GB SSD is able to achieve first (Home Score) or second place (Work Score… The GP107 is the first GPU built with the 14nm process (Samsung) and packs 768 CUDA cores, 32 ROPs and 48 textures units. Windows 8 64-bit build 9200. wont submit scores. Memory clock: 1500 MHz These scores can be used as reference for checking your FurMark score with FurMark 1.9.x and FurMark 1.10.x (will be released shortly, currently in testing…). Catalyst 13.1 Drivers Catalyst 12.3 -8.961-120405a-137813C-ATI (4-5-2012) But I feel like this is quite low compared to my old 6850. GTX 1070 im Test: 6K- und 8K-Benchmarks mittels DSR . I was able to crack 17k on the overall score with a 1070, but I'm using an X58 system that's about 6 years old. and i forgot to mention this but the resolution was 1024*768 at 720p. @Sandy Instability can be because of OC going to far or an insufficient power supply. MSAA samples: 0 Catalyst – 8.723.8.2-100920a-105610C-Sony (9-20-2010) The smaller the overlap between the yellow and green bars, the better the value for money. CPU speed: 3499 MHz und 2x westerndigital 500gb und 32mb cache …. galaxy geforce gt610 2gb, Temp at 50% 64c Resolution: 1024×768 (W) – AA:0 samples fan speed I have on 100% but thats personal preference on what you do for that. GPU core: 450 MHz, memory: 790 MHz Welcome to the Geekbench OpenCL Benchmark Chart. 9.18.13.1407 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples I only ask because that is the only fix I know. – Radeon RX Vega 64. I'm not really sure why i can only grab 11fps tho. 3D tech news, graphics cards, graphics programming and demoscene, Update: 2020.01.24 Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:8 samples Power Limit—- 0-5% start at 0 then go to 5 one at a time running benchmark after every increase Same with furmark 1.9.x and 1.10.x Any ideas???! Burn-In score:217 (3Fps) “so fast” System memory: 4094 MB 3500 MHz 16289 MB Resolution: 1920 x 1080 – MSI Radeon R9 920X Gaming 4G, Update: 2014.09.24 Average 38fps. well check the 4th line: score: 610 points, temp: 65 celcius. GPU temperatures (start/end): 39°C / 72°C, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100494 is that right? Update: 2016.08.25 Max GPU Temp: 80°C Furmark – 1920×1080 13190 frames, 14 FPS How am I averaging 47 fps on a regular 1070 versus your 42 on the Ti with the same settings?

The most advanced gaming GPU ever created. Burn-In score 2585points(28 FPS) It remained at “avg:4” in warm-ups and never went below “avg=3” during benchmarking, the whole time. CPU: 4616 MHz 15 min burn test (FX, Dynbkg)on a Geforce GTX 650 Ti, What about the GTX 560? Dynamic background Renderer: Geforce GTX 670/PCIe/SSEE2 (10DE-1189) GPU temperatures (start/end): 44°C / 71°C, Number of GPUs: 1 RAM: 16383 MB OS Windows 7 32-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], I just ran the benchmark on 1080p and 1080*1680 and got this: CM HAFx FULL TOWER WINDOW I get a failure when I try to Submit results. Operating system: Windows 8 64-bit build 9200 No Service Pack. FX 8120 @ 4ghz Max GPU Temp: 90°C GPU0 – Vendor: 0x10de – Device: 0x1004 – Max GPU temp: 65 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit build 7600 No Service Pack, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=152562, 3534 points with a stock oc (735/1010) 5970 @1920×1080. Windows XP 32-bit build 2600 [Dodatek Service Pack 3], SCORE:4800 points (80 FPS, 60000 ms) Tested more than twice. I am on an old version of Furmark if that makes any difference (v1.19.0.0). GeForce GTX 680/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1180) y have a 560ti, it s not here and y have note that when y run the program the gpu works at 475mhz :S. @hurt: I don’t have all available cards on the market (fortunately, otherwise the benchmarking session will never end… ). Intel Core i7-9700K Processor, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 x 1, 16384 MB, 64-bit Windows 10} 46093 frames, 51 FPS, 76°C GTX 1070 Ti Furmark Test w/ Custom Fan Curve. Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], Does that sound alright? Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2700K CPU @ 3.50GHz os: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], BURN-IN SCORE: 9226 points 720 preset: 2218 points (36 FPS, 60000 ms) Oh and i modified my fan settings to run at 80% at 50 Cel and 100% at 70 cel, i had a steady temp of 60 at peak. Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 Service Pack 1. PC Specification: FurMark Preset: 1080(FHD) Benchmark score for PC Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz GeForce GTX 1070 MSI Armor OC 8GB Edition 16GB RAM submitted by AJDaMan at 22:09 Aug … MSAA samples: 0 saving for a better graphics card for sure but this seems to work well for what it is. AMD Athlon II X4 630 2.8ghz Built on the 16 nm process, and based on the GP104 graphics processor, in its GP104-200-A1 variant, the card supports DirectX 12. Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU @ 3.90GHz Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz, Is that about right?? Is it about what I should be expecting though? CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3930K CPU @ 4.70GHz SCORE: 130 points (2FPS, 60000ms) My 5970 was 3731 1080 preset which puts it above the 6970 CF – I know it isn’t that good! Please answer to mail: aleks2990@hotmail.com, BURN-INSCORE:2145 points (35 FPS, 60000 ms) It’s obviously not a correct score, and every other benchmark it gets its expected score in. i got a 413 score for ati mobility radeon 550v. drivers: 9.18.13.2018 (5-12-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 Score 2192 for crossfire 2x$100 HD7770 cards. Graphics drivers: 9.18.13.2018 5-12-2013 – GLnvoglv64 GPU0 – Vendor: 0x1002 – Device: 0x6798 – Max GPU temp: 71 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], BURN-IN SCORE: 4642 points OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601[Service Pack 1]. 9.18.13.1407 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 Three kind of scores are available on these charts: Settings: Preset:1080 (1920×1080 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode). Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, Cross 7970 1000/1450 OS:Windows 7 64-bit, 2690 frames, 44 FPS, 81°C I only got 1488 points (24 FPS, 60000 ms). Window режим: полноэкранный 1080p, 8xMSAA, Fullscreen, dynamic background, Burn-in. There’s a headline all over a week ago. http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=55545. Temp at 100% 66c The GXT 1070 Ti impresses with a score of 58fps at 1440p, nearly as high as the RTX 2060, but the Vega 56 and Vega 64 cards become increasingly competitive at higher … I'd be interested in others thoughts (other than "you should have bought a 1080). http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=63006 Overall score is a bit low due to your CPU. FPS: min:81, max:87, avg:83 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Preset:1080 GPU core: 1165 MHz, memory: 1375 MHz I meant (and 1x 4:3, leaving out 16:10) instead of (and 1x 16:10, leaving out 4:3) in above (second last) post. Resolution: 1920 x 1080 @ 1920×1080 SCORE: 4437 points, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=127093, SCORE:679 points (11 FPS, 60000 ms) Max GPU Temp: 58°C Resolution: 1280×720 (W) – AA:0 samples FPS: min:12, max:13, avg:11 – OPTIONS: DynBkg GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-0F00) 9.18.13.1407 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 GPU core: 940 MHz, memory: 890 MHz AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 250 Processor 4050 MHz 4093 MB Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], Submitted by imprimis (anonymous mode) on May 31 2013, 9:45 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds 9.18.13.2723 (9-12-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 http://www.techpowerup.com/164027/1366-x-768-The-Most-Popular-Screen-Resolution-Overtakes-1024-x-768-StatCounter.html. – GIGABYTE BRIX GTX 760. FPS: min:29, max:32, avg:30 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Nvidia GTX 560 1GB DDR5 The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. That’s crazy, is that even possible? The 1050 Ti has a TDP of 75 Watts and is based on a new 14nm GP107 processing core which has approximately 66% of the key resources (CUDA cores, texture units, memory bandwidth and transistor count etc.) The data on this chart is calculated from Geekbench 5 results users have uploaded to the Geekbench Browser. We talked about the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti for numerous times now, it was bound to happen as the first 3DMark results have arrived of the product. Score – 9387, BURN-IN SCORE: 491 points Th… 1830 MHz/1535 MB Catalyst 12.8 – 8.982-120727a-145524C-ATI (7-27-2012), Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 4400 @ 2.00GHz, Windows 7 32-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100493 Furmark screenshot at the end of 1 hour 12 minutes along with the custom fan curve are posted in this imgur album. Device ID: 0x10de – 0x1004 This chart compares the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti with the most popular Graphics Cards over the last 30 days. CPU speed:4709 MHz FPS: min:86, max:87, avg:85 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Максимальная температура 66 ° C Clocks: GPU core: 1188 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz 3402 MHz (real: 4402 MHz) / 16348 MB Who’s laughing now. found on the 3GB GTX 1060. Score 2231 for the crossfire 2x$100 HD7770 cards. Oh was 1280 x 1024 dpi by the way with No Anti Aliasing! Update drivers etc too. Here's the excel doc. Benchmark Preset Score GPU When; FurMark(donut) | OpenGL: P1080: 4254: Radeon RX 570 Series Powered by NVIDIA Pascal™ architecture, the ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Series is the world’s most advanced gaming GPU ever created. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples I haven't cranked up the memory clock very far as i'm new to OC'ing, using MSI Afterburner. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1] MSI GTX 660TI PE with a small OC To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each GPU, the chart only includes GPUs with at least five unique results in the Geekbench Browser. But this is my first pascal card. ok. As much as I hate to feedback on a hard day work of blood & sweat, it seems work itself is still in progress, thus I continue. 46102 frames, 51 FPS, 87°C Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz. But can in 720. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:4 samples Here are the final benchmark results of this new card, compared to GTX 1080 Ti (factory-OC), 1080 (factory-OC) and 1070 (stock clocks). Catalyst 13.9 – 13.152-130830a-162200C-ATI (8-30-2013) first was on saved profile 4 and cant remember if it was set to my current res of 1920×1080. 3900 MHz/16337 MB GPU core: 1241 MHz, memory: 3445 MHz Bugs: Not displaying any logo (Intel/otherwise) in top-right box, “Renderer” stating “Intel HD Graphics” when the actual IGP is HD 2000 (same driver v2656). That's running the 1080 Preset, with NVidia driver now back in Quality mode. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples system memory:8172 MB I logged everything through Corsair Link (intervals of 60s). score: 2864pts, Max GPU Temp: 39°C 7850 The score of your HD 5970 looks correct, because 63Deg C. Catalyst 13.2 Though later would have unfairly greater burn-in stress-level compared to former one, exclusively in case of Intel HD IGP’s. I have a Phantom 410 with 1 stock intake and 1 Premium intake both 120mm, 1 120mm stock exhaust at the rear and a 140mm prem and 120mm prem exhaust at the top through a corsair H100 Radiator. FPS: min:15, max:16, avg:14 – OPTIONS: DynBkg CPU speed: 3403 MHz radeon 5670, win xp 32-bit FPS: min:23, avg:25 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, System Info: This seems surprisingly low to me. See this article for details on powertune. скамьи Продолжительность: 15 мин Testing furmark … GPU core: 1280 MHz, memory: 3121 MHz Resolution: 1440×900 (Max supported. But then again, I'm not one of the smart folks who know all about troubleshooting. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is ~19% faster than RTX 3080 The GeForce RTX 3090 scores 20387 ‘graphics’ points in Time Spy 1440p preset. 1280*1024 score was 976 with 16fps is it alright? CPU speed: 3400 MHz FurMark benchmark scores database - OpenGL / Vulkan. MSI GTX 1050 Ti is powered by a full Pascal GP107 GPU. You can either exempt “fullscreen” in this case or provide a reconsidered base-line for 16:9. thanks in advance! 8GB DDR3 @ 1600 I would have thought the Ti was faster than that. GPU core: 1050 MHz, memory: 1425 MHz Max GPU Temp: 0°C In few moments I hope, the HD 7970 will be benchmarked. I am getting a second card soon so i will post the CF results when i can. i5-3570k @ 4.2ghz With PowerTune set to +20%, the HD 6970 CF gets around 4700 points. Core Clock: 900mhz <–max (+70mhz) Nvidia geforce GTX 550 ti Might help. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples hate it when i do that lol. FPS: min:51, max:53, avg:51, Still cant play skyrim in surround with enb.. Memory clock: 1500 MHz My non-overclocked GTX-1070 achieves a FurMark score of 5953, with 99 FPS average. I should also mention, I had sli 1070's and I was getting the odd stutter and crash and I didn't know what was causing it until I swapped cards one day when I was having game crashes and instantly got checkerboarding on the screen and any 3d application worked badly. Max temp 92°C, I beat the top score for the 6970 i got 4784 points (79 FPS), http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=107774, nvidia geforce gt520 59Deg C. yeah man i beat the number 2 on 1280-720 with5650 points runnin core i3 and gtx 480, Just did the 15min run and scored 4913 thats kind higher points than the top no 1 lol at 54FPs. I also have two monitors (if that makes any difference). Who’s laughing now. System Memory |2046MB Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit, BURN-IN SCORE: 3107 points 30728 frames, 34 FPS, 72°C 1920×1080, GTX 680 (stock cooling) @ My pair of overclocked 460’s gets just over 5000 points with the 720p test. Burn-in profile 5 is my comfort level and pretty sure its pretty high setting (see below) as im a noob at using this kind of software. http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=110734, GeForce GTX 660/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-11C0) Memory Clock: 1150mhz (+25mhz) 1080p and over 2500 points with HD 7870… Max. Window mode: fullscreen, Primary renderer: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2 different tests on 15 min burn. so whats’ wrong? 4 GB RAM DDR2 800 mhz. GeForce GTX 670/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189) 1090t 6 core processor 8 gigs ram. Sounds quite low to me . SCORE:1800 points (30 FPS, 60000 ms), Stock settings (800/1250) – 1696/28FPS@1080. I have one and I have only 569 points so I want to compare with other scores, Primary renderer: Gigabyte Windforce 3x OC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit FPS: min:12, max:15, avg:12 – OPTIONS: XB FX DynBkg, renderer: GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-11C2) GPU temperatures (start/end): 37°C / 65°C, Number of GPUs: 1 FPS: mn=3, mx=5, av=2 Windows 7 64-bit build 7600 [No Service Pack], Sapphire Radeon 7870xt 2gb ddr5 The GTX 1070-based laptops will score anywhere between 87 and 97 FPS, which will require a fair bit of tweaking to match a 120Hz monitor. Need MORE POWER , MSI Radeon 7750 Stock cooling system memory: 8Gb DDR2 (PC2-6400) Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 67848 frames, 83 FPS, 79°C Discussion. amd a4 5300 3.4ghz cpu, as stated the cpu is NOT overclocked and last reported running at 3.67, 3.37* as 3.67 would be clocked. Video Card: Asus - GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB ROG STRIX Video Card ($469.99 @ Newegg) ... been having the same problems since installing geforce experience and just found a solution that turned my furmark score from 3407 to 5789 go to nvidia control panel manage 3d settings Backstory: I upgraded from a 970 (also reference) whose custom fan curve enabled that card to perform wonderfully never exceeding 65C. Please clarify: you state the benches are 1080 preset but also burn-in test mode – those are two separate button in 1.10.0 unless it’s the 15-min burn-in? – added Preset:2160 scores. What are your thoughts? Device ID: 0x1002 – 0x6798 8gb mem installed (factory), will expand to the 32 at a later date amd a4 5300 3.4, stock clock settings 4497 frames, 4 FPS, 62°C, ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 (1002-68C1) Memory clock: 3004 MHz Preset:1080 You won't see that much of an improvement with a 6700k. I upgraded from a 970 (also reference) whose custom fan curve enabled that card to perform wonderfully never exceeding 65C. I ran the test @ 1280×720, following your criteria, with exception being windowed and not full-screen as crap 19-inch “HD-LED” wont switch to full at that resolution. Resolution: 1920×1080 (W) – AA:8 samples – added GTX 1080 2-way SLI P1080 score. Ive never topped any table tis a crying shame lol sort it out please. max temp: 79C This ensures that all modern games will run on GeForce GTX 1070. Max GPU Temp: 80°C 1280×720 on GTX 670, Max GPU Temp: 69°C Device ID: 0x1002 – 0x6798 Memory Clock—- 1375(MHz) Running windows from an SSD but Furmark from a WD blue drive Win 7 64-bit, Idle temp: 47°C 1GB Asus GTX 560 Ti DCU2*TOP* But this is my first pascal card. temperature 57°C. cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz Core Clock—- 950(MHz) GPU core: 1005 MHz, memory: 3105 MHz GPU core: 607 MHz, memory: 1603 MHz Surely it should be around 30fps, like the 5850. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. GPU core: 950MHz Window mode: fullscreen, Primary renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7970 ... Snaike my furmark score is 5895 I looked at your post yours went from 2852 to a score of 6008. AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series (1002-6739) From all the reviews, this card performs more like a 1080 than a 1070, which is why I got it. Min temp 60°C The 1070 I received had all ports covered by plastic caps. ATI Radeon 9550 / X1050 Series (1002-4153) GPU mem: 1800MHz zotac geforce gtx 1070 ti amp extreme edition 8gb gddr5 zt-p10710b-10p Pretty much okay considering the processor I have, good temps too :3, (Tested) Unigine Heaven 2.0 Direct3D 11 Scores, GpuTest 0.2.0: Cross Platform OpenGL Benchmark, FurMark Lands on Linux and OS X, AMD FirePro W9100 OpenGL 4 FP32 and FP64 Scores (Julia Fractal), (TessMark) OpenGL 4 Tessellation Benchmark: Comparative Table, Demoscene: Source Code of Farbrausch’s Demo Tools 2001-2011 Available, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=55545, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=63006, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75233, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78098, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78113, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100493, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100494, NVIDIA GeForce 457.67 win10 x64 (Vulkan 1.2.164), AMD Radeon Adrenalin 2020 (20.12.1) win10 x64, AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 2020 Edition 20.12.2, NVIDIA GeForce Hotfix display driver 460.97, NVIDIA Vulkan 1.2.164 developer driver 457.67, NVIDIA GeForce 460.27.04 for AArch64, Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris, Raytraced Shadows in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, Microsoft's Creepy New Productivity Score Gamifies Workplace Surveillance, AMD RDNA 2: Hardware-accelerated Ray Tracing in Radeon ProRender 2.0, AMD RDNA 2 Hangar 21 Technology Demo Video (DX12 Raytracing), GeeXLab 0.39 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.38.0 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.37.0 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.36.0 released for Windows, Linux and Raspberry Pi, (Game) Imbricker 0.3.0 Released for Windows, Linux and Raspberry Pi, How to Install NVIDIA Graphics Drivers on Linux Mint 17, Electronics: blinking LED with Raspberry Pi GPIO and GeeXLab, AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce FP32/FP64 GFLOPS Table. 34°C FurMark GpuTest Benchmark score for PC Core i5-4460 3.2GHz GeForce GTX 1070 Asus ROG Strix Gaming OC 8GB Edition 16GB RAM submitted by marky117 at 15:32 Jul-12 … Killer 2100 Gaming NetworkCard, my 7950 smoked the 680 in this haha http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75233, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75234, ATI Radeon HD 5770 GPU max temp got to 99… how bad is this… and should I do the full test… 99 was at about half and I just didnt like it being that hot. CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 245 Processor Renderer:GeForce GTX 480 1080p FPS: min:45, max:46, avg:44 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, GeForce GTX 760/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1187) You know all I’m interested these days, is in Intel HD GFX which are probably still under-testing as aren’t there in above charts. We have the first benchmarks results for the upcoming flagship TITAN-class graphics card, the GeForce RTX 3090. MSI’s GTX 1050 Ti comes with three modes for the GPU clock speeds: Silent mode (base: 1290MHz, boost: 1392MHz), Gaming mode (base: 1303MHz, boost: 1417MHz) and OC mode(base: 1316MHz, boost: 1430MHz). The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. Sapphire Radeon HD 7950 oc. Getting a new 8350 machine with a gtx 780 next week and I will run same exact test. Peak temp: 94°C I also get failure when i try to submit results and im also registered shame really i’d be top of that chart now dagnammit gigabyte oc edition 7970 4978points only 58 frames though at 1080 max temp 72 min temp 34 cat 12.8 phenom ii 955 be at stock 3.2ghz. 2600K@ 5.2Ghz (water) and Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 22704 frames, 25 FPS, 70’C System Memory: 16330 MB Zum Abschluss der Leistungsbetrachtung haben wir ein paar unserer berühmt-berüchtigten Extrem-Benchmarks für Sie. Hi guys, In Furmarks I scored 3645 pts. GPU clock: 1005 MHz Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples resolution:1920×1080 GPU temperatures (start/end): 39°C / 77°C, Number of GPUs: 1 @ 2xAA Jerome, somethings wrong here. Duration: 5min The data on this chart is calculated from Geekbench 5 results users have uploaded to the Geekbench Browser.